World reaches ‘tragic milestone’ of one million COVID-19 deaths so far in 2022

There have been one million COVID-19 deaths so far this year – a “tragic milestone” that must lead to more people being vaccinated against the disease, World Health Organization (WHO) chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus reported on Thursday.

“We cannot say we are learning to live with COVID-19 when one million people have died with COVID-19 this year alone, when we are two-and-a-half years into the pandemic and have all the tools necessary to prevent these deaths,” said Tedros, speaking during his regular briefing from Geneva.

He again urged all governments to step up action to vaccinate all health workers, older persons, and others at highest risk, as part of efforts towards inoculating 70 per cent of the global population.

Progress for priority groups

Tedros said he was pleased to see that some countries with the lowest vaccination rates are now gaining ground, especially in Africa.

In January, WHO and partners launched the COVID-19 Vaccine Delivery Partnership, focused mainly on the 34 countries that were at or below 10 per cent coverage.  All but six are on the continent.

Today, only 10 countries still have less than 10 per cent coverage, most of which are facing humanitarian emergencies. 

Vaccinations still lagging

Although welcoming progress on coverage of high-priority groups, Tedros stressed that more must be done as one-third of the world’s population remains unvaccinated. 

This includes two-thirds of health workers, and three-quarters of older persons in low-income countries.

“All countries at all income levels must do more to vaccinate those most at risk, to ensure access to life-saving therapeutics, to continue testing and sequencing, and to set tailored, proportionate policies to limit transmission and save lives. This is the best way to drive a truly sustainable recovery,” he said.

Monkeypox reversal

Meanwhile, intense Monkeypox transmission continues in the Americas region, although the number of cases globally fell by more than 20 per cent last week.

While most cases in the early stage of the outbreak were in Europe, with a smaller proportion in the Americas, the situation has now reversed.

Currently, less than 40 per cent of reported cases are in Europe and 60 per cent are in the Americas.

There are signs that the outbreak is slowing in Europe, Tedros reported, where a combination of effective public health measures, behaviour change, and vaccination, are helping to prevent transmission.

“However, in Latin America in particular, insufficient awareness or public health measures are combining with a lack of access to vaccines to fan the flames of the outbreak,” he said.

Tedros thanked vaccine manufacturer Bavarian Nordic, which on Wednesday signed an agreement with WHO’s Regional Office for the Americas to support access to its Monkeypox vaccine in Latin America and the Caribbean.

He expressed hope that the development will help to bring the outbreak under control in the region.

Source: United Nations

Opening remarks by Deputy President David Mabuza at the engagement with Traditional and Khoisan Leaders, Mangaung, Free State Province

Premier of the Free State Province, Ms Sisi Ntombela,
Morena e Moholo Moremoholo Mopeli,
Morena e Moholo Montoeli Mota,
Chairperson of the National House of Traditional and Khoisan Leaders, Nkosikazi Mhlauli, Ah! NoSandi!
Chairperson of the Provincial House of Traditional Leaders, Morena Neo Mopeli,
Marena le Mafumahadi,
Deputy Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, Mr Mcebisi Skwatsha,
Deputy Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Mr Obed Bapela,
Members of the Provincial Executive Council,
Mayors present,
Senior Government Officials,
Ladies and Gentlemen, 
 
We wish to take this opportunity to convey our sincere word of appreciation to you Premier Ntombela, for your warm words of welcome to this beautiful city of Mangaung, here in the Free State province.
 
Thank you for hosting this critical engagement with traditional leaders to deliberate on a range of issues affecting the standing and leadership role of traditional in development and service delivery. We also acknowledge your leadership role in fostering partnerships between the provincial government and traditional leadership institutions in the Province to ensure that the quality of lives of traditional communities are improved.
 
We thank all our revered traditional leaders for availing themselves to participate in today’s discussions. Traditional leaders are a vital cog in our democratic governance system across all spheres of government.
 
They remain central to the tasks of building safe and cohesive communities, and ensuring that our history, culture, languages, and heritage are celebrated and preserved for generations to come.
 
In the face of social ills confronting our communities, traditional leaders have an essential leadership role to play in working with government to deepen a culture of human rights for all. As leaders, you have a critical role to play in reversing the scourge of crime, gender-based violence and substance abuse within communities.
 
Working together with traditional leadership institutions, government is able to develop programmes that are responsive to challenges of unemployment, poverty and lack of key services in rural communities.
 
We must address underdevelopment and infrastructure deficits in rural communities. This requires deliberate and targeted investments in rural infrastructure networks to provide access to water and sanitation, electricity and roads that connect communities to workplaces, schools and health facilities.
 
It is common knowledge that traditional leaders have, over time, raised issues for consideration by government across a number of developmental aspects, including financial resources to build capacity of traditional leadership institutions and structures to execute their mandates. Some of the issues are currently being implemented by government, whereas others remain in the pipeline for resolution and action.
 
At the highest level of government, there is a commitment to act with a sense of urgency in resolving a number of issues that traditional leaders have raised. As part of this commitment, the President established the Inter-Ministerial Task Team chaired by the Deputy President to oversee government’s coordinated approach and response to issues affecting traditional leaders throughout the country.
 
The dialogue held with traditional leaders after the opening of the National House early this year laid an important foundation for our ongoing engagements with traditional leaders in all provinces.
 
Today’s reports and inputs will reflect on progress made on the composite list of priority issues that were raised with government. We will provide updates on progress made by various work streams established to pursue and resolve some of the sector-specific issues.
 
More importantly, we need to isolate some of the province-specific issues and map out a way to foster communication and collaboration between traditional leaders and government, including improved working relations between municipalities and institutions of traditional leadership at local levels.  
 
Among many other issues, land reform remains a critical national intervention to reverse the legacy of land dispossession, and advance restorative justice. We are committed to working with traditional leaders to expand land access beyond what is currently available, and make sure that our land reform programmes achieve the desired transformative goals in an orderly and Constitutionally-defined manner.
 
Today’s engagement occurs just two months after we held the Summit on Communal Land Administration and Tenure Reform.
 
We will reflect on the broad outcomes of this Summit in terms of how it proposes some of the key actions around communal land administration and tenure reforms. Our task today is to make inputs and enrich reports so that lasting solutions are carefully crafted.
 
We are here to engage and take your views on board to shape the future development of our traditional communities. Traditional leaders must see themselves as agents of change.
 
We look forward to your active participation and engagement as we seek solutions to prevailing challenges that confront our rural communities.  
 
I thank you.

Source: The Presidency Republic of South Africa

President Ramaphosa’s leadership on women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health recognised

President Cyril Ramaphosa met with the Right Honorable Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand, and Board Chair of the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (PMNCH), to discuss the need for leaders to urgently address the reversals being witnessed in the health and well-being of women, children and adolescents.

These reversals have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and other compounding crises, such as increasing incidences of conflict and the climate emergency.  

President Ramaphosa and Rt Hon Helen Clark met today, Thursday, 25 August 2022.

Half-way toward the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the world is at a point where instead of working towards closing the gender equity gap, decades of progress are being rolled back, with women’s and girls’ fundamental rights and health under threat. 

PMNCH is the world’s largest alliance for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health and well-being, partnering with sovereign states and over 1,300 partner organizations, hosted by the World Health Organization. The mission of PMNCH is to “mobilise, align and amplify the voices of partners to advocate for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health and well-being, particularly the most vulnerable.”
 
The President and Rt. Hon. Clark explored opportunities to undertake high-level political advocacy and strategic interventions to amass political, financial, and programmatic commitments from all sectors of society, including the private sector, critical to delivering on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This includes the SDG 3 targets for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health, especially in the face of the toxic combination of COVID-19, escalating gender-based violence, economic instability, the climate crisis and conflicts. 
 
South Africa’s leadership is anchored in a set of commitments by the government to implement various programs at the country level that address service delivery, financial resourcing, nutrition, HIV prevention and youth empowerment. 
 
Says President Ramaphosa: “I was impressed with the way the PMNCH sought to elicit our commitments for our people first because indeed charity begins at home. I hope that as Head of State, I can  build confidence in our ability to positively impact these vulnerable population groups by sharing the models being implemented across the Republic of South Africa, exchanging best practices, and mobilizing other champions to galvanise greater action, thereby elicit lasting commitments for real change in the lived experience of our women, adolescents and children.” 

The Right Honorable Helen Clark met with President Ramaphosa to invite President Ramaphosa to engage closely with PMNCH to shape the agenda for the Partnership at the highest political levels. “We are deeply honored that President Ramaphosa has agreed to support this critical agenda as we need urgent and transformative action to reverse these worrying trends. This will help drive the much-needed political will behind issues that impact on outcomes for women, children and adolescents. At PMNCH, we are committed to working alongside the President to position this agenda so that action is taken to get back on track towards achievement of SDG3. “At this time when compounding crises are rolling back previous progress made on women’s empowerment and the health of communities,” she said.

Source: The Presidency Republic of South Africa

Alhassan Alidu is uplifting the Moore language by bringing it online

Alhassan Alidu is truly putting in the work to bring the Moore language into the digital world. Moore is one of two official regional languages in Burkina Faso, Africa. It is spoken primarily by Mossis such as Alhassan. The Mossi people make up the largest ethnic group in Burkina Faso, with around 6 million Mossi currently living within the country and more living elsewhere in countries such as Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire.  In 1896, the French colonized Burkina Faso, and remained there until independence in 1960. Due to this, French is technically the official language of the country. Moore is more widely spoken, but, as Alhassan points out, the legacies of colonization act as barriers to the digital implementation of Moore and other regional languages.

As the executive director of the Moore Wikimedia Community, Alhassan is providing Moore with a digital platform that exists in the face of dominating Western media and languages (e.g. French and English), and allows for a larger and more accessible diffusion of the language. He has also created a YouTube page with helpful resources detailing how to use Wikimedia, as well as an Instagram account that provides language tips and highlights the contributions of Moore Wikimedia members. You can follow Alhassan on Twitter at @Hasslaebetch and the Moore Wikimedia Community at @Moore_Wikimedia. With these resources, Alhassan hopes to provide the Moore language with a permanent digital presence that can be used by the Moore community throughout the world and for years to come.

Rising Voices (RV): Please tell us about yourself and your language-related work.

Alhassan Alidu (AA): I am Alhassan Alidu, my username is Hasslaebetch, and my Twitter handle is @Hasslaebetch. I am a Moore (Mossi) by tribe and I speak Moore, Dagbani and English. Burkina Faso is the homeland of my parents but they relocated to Ghana and so I was born in Ghana and as such I am a Ghanaian by nationality. I edit in Dagbani and Moore. Even though I have not studied Moore in my university education, it behooves me to assist my language to come on deck in the digital space. I collaborate with language experts so that our mother tongue can also have a space at the right time in the digital environment. My experience in editing in Dagbani gave me the zeal to forge ahead to reaching a goal possible together with the Moore community and the Moore people at large.

RV: What is the current state of your language both online and offline?

AA: There are many factors hindering the existence of the Moore language in digital spaces. Online, the language is unheard — this is as a result of French and English barriers. Moore is largely spoken in Burkina Faso but Burkina Faso is a Francophone country — they speak more of French than English — and as a result the language is lost in the English digital space. Moore speaking people in surrounding countries like Ghana make better use of the English language than French. Offline, there is a lot of progress in archiving the language in books and magazines. Lots of writers have emerged and they have done a lot of work on the language. Hopefully, these writers will translate that into the digital space for generations yet unborn to fully utilize the language.

RV: What are your motivations for seeing your language present in digital spaces?

AA: My motivation is driven by my passion to put the language in the limelight so that it will be accessible to those who are far from the indigenous speakers and still want to learn or continue to get in touch with their mother language. Future generations must not lose the quality of the language as a result of our negligence to duly archive the language. The digital space gives a very good environment for one to be able to preserve his/her language, culture and national identity. All these elements give relief and motivation to me for seeing my language present in the digital space. But beyond this, one can be sure that future generations would work tirelessly to improve upon the content being published in Wikipedia and all its sister projects.

RV: Describe some of the challenges that prevent your language from being fully utilized online.

AA: Lack of understanding of one’s language can discourage a person from trying to utilize the language. Most people do not see reasons why they need to learn their language because the language is not used in any official communication with the state agencies. Additionally, the French/English mix is somewhat challenging. Some Moore speakers also speak either English or French. As these languages are international languages, they are given much more priority than the Moore language. African countries colonized by the Western world adopted foreign languages as the means of all official communication to the government and all government establishments. The media and privately owned enterprises do not make use of the local language. This resulted in a reduction in interest in speaking the local language to children by parents and as a result, the coming generations are gradually losing their language.

RV: What concrete steps do you think can be taken to encourage younger people to begin learning their language or keep using their language?

AA: In this globalized world, being able to speak your native language is something that we need to value. Speaking the language frequently and studying the language will enable one to master the language and have the zeal to utilize it. Inability to speak a good language doesn’t encourage the speaker to speak. People normally will always speak the language they are fluent at rather than what may be challenging to speak. People must find entertainment in the language they speak. Media houses like TV stations, radio stations must have programs that would entertain people in their dialects. Movies, music, poems and news items could have sessions of local language for people to have the zeal in learning the language. Language courses could also be organized for interested people or it could be added to the curriculum to aid learning the language. More so, online tools could be developed to assist people to practice short phrases, learn new vocabulary and even try pronunciation and subsequent speaking.

Source: Global Voices

Key points of Minister of Foreign Affairs Nikos Dendias’ remarks at a conversation with students and alumni of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government (Athens, 25.08.2022)

Thank you so much for the opportunity; it is really a great pleasure for me to meet future leaders of this world.

The one thing we need more than anything else in this world now, is human capital. So young talented people that care about humanity, care about the world is, I think, the number one issue we should address.

Having said that, I also thank you for the honor of coming to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and having this discussion.

Well, Greece is a medium-sized European democracy with a huge history, important history.

I will just give you a very quick overview; I am seeing the Greek foreign policy as the symbol of the Olympic Games with intersecting circles.

Circle number one is our European neighborhood, mainly partners within the European Union, but also, obviously, the United Kingdom.

Second circle is to our south. It’s rather a big circle and an expanding circle, it is the Middle East, it is the Gulf and it is also North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa. We see these too as] quite well connected with our neighborhood.

In Northern Europe, if you have the same discussion in Brussels, many people see the Mediterranean as a border. That has never been the case in history. The Mediterranean has always, since Ancient Greek times, been a bridge.

And why am I saying that? Because many challenges now come from Africa and especially Sub-Saharan Africa, and we have to pay very close attention to that bridge.

A third circle is the Balkans, especially now, the Western Balkans. Greece has been extremely successful in helping the Eastern Balkan countries become members of the European Union. The Western Balkans is a challenge; difficult cases, no way for stability, peace and prosperity unless they eventually come into the European family.

Fourth, extremely important for us, the United States, our number one military ally for the last half century. Our relations with the United States are now at an all-time high.

I have myself signed two Agreements with the United States, and also we cooperate very closely, even in the current crisis we are facing after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The fifth circle is what we call “beyond the horizon”, which means East Asia. I was a few weeks ago in Phnom Penh signing an Agreement with the ASEAN; Vietnam, for us a very important country, China, an extremely important country for Greece as well, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

But also, the rest of Africa; Africa is the fastest expanding continent in the world economically but also population-wise; South and Central America.

There is a sixth circle, which has to do with issues. On top of this circle, for us there are two things: International Law, a rules-based order- and the environment.

There are other things as well. For example, the Francophonie. We have been members for years, we have a very active role in the Francophonie. The Lusophony, the countries who speak Portuguese. We have signed an agreement with them.

But also, the environment; we care a lot, we care dearly. We are a conservative government but we think that unless we address the challenge of the environment, all the other challenges mean nothing. We destroy our world as we proceed.

I am going to meet Secretary Kerry, on Sunday, he is coming to Athens. We are organizing in consultation] with the United States the “Our Ocean Conference 2024” to help preserve the maritime environment. We care a lot, we are the biggest merchant maritime power in the world.

But also, on the issue of International Law, we are conducting three campaigns in the United Nations because we would like to be relevant, we would like to advocate for international law.

We are trying to be elected to the United Nations Security Council for 2025-2026. We would like to become a member of the Human Rights Council for 2028-2030, and also, we would like to get the Presidency of the General Assembly early in the next decade.

So, that’s a very concise presentation of what we are trying to do. But I am looking forward to your open questions and I will try to answer them the best way I can.

Again, I am really thankful for the opportunity you gave me.

QUESTION: Minister, thank you so much for meeting us today, it’s a great honor.

There are a few of us in the room who are very interested in U.S. foreign policy and who will actually join the U.S. Foreign Service as diplomats upon graduation and -we posed this question to a few of the leaders we’ve already met-  but I am just curious as to what your thoughts are as to how the U.S. can better support Greece and its future endeavors, including joining the Human Rights Council,  U.N. Security Council, and why you think that’s something the United States’ foreign policy objective should focus on, in this relationship.

N. DENDIAS: Thank you.

We are very happy with the Greek-US relations. It has never ever been that good. But having said that, that does not mean we cannot do more.

And we are very much aligned with the U.S. foreign policy on the approach to a rules-based society. We believe that a revisionist policy, no matter who is the actor, has no place in this world. The strong one cannot impose its views and its opinion on the weak one. That’s not the world we aspire to create.

We are not in the 16th century anymore. Humanity has struggled for centuries to get beyond the Machiavellian approach to international politics.

So, what we would like from the United States is to support medium and smaller countries to become more involved on the international stage on this agenda, on the agenda of International Law.

And we believe that -if I am reading the United States Constitution well- that serves the American long-term interest as well. Because the main part of the American foreign policy throughout the ages was in favor of the rules-based international order, in favor of principles and in favor of ideals.

So why not subscribe to this effort by a country that was the first country that created democracy in this world.

Thank you.

QUESTION: Thank you again, Minister, for hosting us.

The question I have is what do you think is relevant for countries such as Greece when you are dealing with asymmetric relations with countries that are larger in terms of positioning their national interest in the global sphere?

N. DENDIAS:  When I first came here, I was initially thought that problems are solvable when you treat them in a rational way. If you understand the interest of the other side and you accept, you respect what is legal and you act accordingly. And I couldn’t have been proven more wrong in the case of our big neighbour, Turkey.

Because all these three years I have to tell you we are living under a constant crisis with ups and downs, but all this time our relations with Turkey have been crisis at a crisis level. And that has never been the case after 1974.

After 1974 –1974 was the Turkish invasion of Cyprus– we had ups and downs, crises, very big crises, but then there was almost immediately a de-escalation. In this case, in all the three years, we are facing a constant deterioration of this.

And I will show you why, and what is the basic reason. I can show you a few maps. This is a turkish map, you see where the dividing line is and you see that Crete is also colored red.

Now, if Turkey starts from that point of view, how can we ever have a good understanding with Turkey? I suppose it is quite similar to President Putin’s dreams of how an “acceptable” Ukraine would look in the future. No.

If you think I am exaggerating this is called «the Blue Homeland», in Turkish “Mavi Vatan”, the idea that Turkey is entitled to what is painted blue.

And just to prove to you that we are not daydreaming; this is President Erdogan speaking in front of that map to the cadets of the Turkish Naval Academy.

So, I have to say, in my humble opinion, the problems we are having with Turkey and the problems smaller countries have with bigger countries are solvable. But the way to solve them and the way to address them is to accept a common set of rules.

And what are the rules? They are not rules by choice, they are not rules a la carte, it is international law. And this case is international law of the sea.

If we both accept this as the basis of our discussion our problems are very easily solvable. And we have a huge respect for our bigger neighbor. But if, for example, we are trying to solve a geometry exercise together and you are implementing Euclidean geometry in which parallels exist, and I am implementing para-elliptical geometry in which parallels do not exist, how can we ever solve this exercise together? We will never do that.

So, the answer is smaller countries and bigger countries have to accept international law if we would like humanity to progress.

QUESTION: Foreign Minister, I wanted to maybe touch on ring number 5 and number 6 of your presentation, which is around Africa, the broader emerging world, and ring number 6 which is around international law and climate change which you mentioned. And I think one of the questions I have is around meeting the long-term commitments that have been made for climate change to the developing world, this 100 billion dollar commitment that’s been made for climate change mitigation and financing.

And how you see at your level and also at European level these commitments being met in light of the challenges that we are seeing on the energy side and the inflation side. Also, because I think what the Prime Minister highlighted to us two days ago is the end of enhanced surveillance for Greece in terms of the fiscal side. So, I am imagining that one of the things that Greece wants to do is really step out into the world and show leadership, I think, especially on the climate change side.

So I just wanted your thoughts about how you are approaching the forthcoming COP27 meeting which is being hosted in Africa which has parallel to ring number 5 of your presentation.

N. DENDIAS: Thank you. First of all we are very happy that Egypt is hosting in Sharm El-Sheikh the COP. As I told you before, for us Africa is extremely important.

But you also addressed this through another angle that is extremely interesting, and this is the economic situation around the world after the Russian invasion.

We are having at the same time two huge challenges.

The first one is climate change which, honestly speaking, is getting beyond control.

So, we have to address this phenomenon or we will destroy humanity. And huge resources have to be used. And, I have to say, 100 billion is too small an amount and I am stating the obvious.

At the same time, because of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we have the huge raise of energy prices, reignition of inflation – which we have forgotten for the 4-5 last decades – and need to re-address the internal balances in the European societies and in western countries, societies and democracies. Where, at the same time, we have the problem of internal inequality, which is again a problem which disrupts the normal functioning of a democratic society.

You cannot throw one part of your population under the poverty line. You have to help them, that is the meaning of the modern state and the modern society.

And in order to address one challenge you are opening yourself to problems in the effort to address the other challenges. And I am sorry to say: there are no quick fixes on this.

In my humble opinion, the best thing democracies can do is to be absolutely open towards the societies on how huge the challenges we are facing are and prepare our societies, for what is coming. Because this is not going to be easy.

QUESTION: Thank you, for having us today. I was wondering if you can walk us through the process of essentially balancing out your allies and the priorities. That would be the US, China, Iran. How do you serve a balance of priorities between very important allies to you.

N. DENDIAS: And I think for China, Greece is an important country.

I have served a few times as a Minister of a small-medium sized country. Yet again, I have seen President Xi three times in my life. That cannot be by coincidence. It is clear that in the Chinese Silk Road map Greece has a role.

And China for us is important because China has invested in Greece in the time of crisis in the Piraeus port. And also, China is a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. Because of the challenges we are facing we need good relations with all the United Nations Security Council members.

Having said that, for us it is clear where we belong. We belong to the western world, we belong to the world of democracies, we are a proud member of NATO since the early ‘50s, and we are a strong and committed ally of the US and a member of the European Union.

So, Chinese investments and good relations with China in a rules-based international order are more than welcome.

In Phnom Penh, I met Minister Wang Yi and I am going to Beijing this autumn. We will continue cultivating our relationship with China.

But that does not mean that we will ever, under any circumstances, compromise our values, our principles and our allies.

QUESTION: Minister, thank you so much for your time. I’d like to ask you about the current energy crisis. On one hand, this winter, threatens to stress a lot of relations between EU countries. So, I’d be curious about what you see as challenges and the foreign policy approaches to mitigating some of these stresses.

And on the other hand, Greece is under construction on the new LNG terminal and is potentially set to be a center point for importing energy into the greater European area.

So, where do you see the opportunities from this current crisis as well?

N. DENDIAS: There are a number of issues that work to our advantage. Number one, is our geographical position, we don’t have that cold winters. Number two, our level of imports, energy imports from Russia are not that big. But that is not the case for most of our European friends and partners.

And on the other hand, we are adamant on issues of principle, on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We have implemented all packages of sanctions and we will continue doing so, we will continue to help Ukraine.

For us, it is more difficult than it sounds, because historically we had a close relationship with Russia. The Russian fleet was one of the three fleets that defeated the Ottoman fleet and was the turning point in the Greek war of independence. But again, principles are principles.

The invader cannot ever be accepted as something that for us is a matter of discussion.

The clever thing we have done in the past, you were kind enough to mention it in your question, is not only balancing our imports but also creating sources for LNG. And we have the Revithousa LNG terminal which is right next to Athens. But also, we have Alexandroupolis which is the second entry point.

And as you see on the map, the distance between Alexandroupolis and Odessa it is smaller than the distance to the straits of Bosporus to Odessa.

Alexandroupolis, which is part of the two Agreements I have signed with the United States, is potentially the main entry point for energy in Central and Eastern Europe. Distance-wise it is much closer, for example, to Vienna than Rotterdam.

So, we have really chosen wisely, or reality has proven us right in creating alternative sources. But of course, this needs a lot of pipelines and other projects that are progressing as we speak.

But at least the right choices have been made before this crisis.

QUESTION: Thank you, Minister, again for taking the time to speak with us today.

One of the core cases that they teach all the HKS and PP1 students is about the Syrian refugee crisis and giving that, you know, the impact of climate change will affect not only the environment but also conflict, food security, therefore drive greater migration and we also see that geopolitical tensions would drive migration as well, we saw that with the invasion of Ukraine.

So, my question relates to how do you think Greece, the European Union and the international community as a whole must work together to deal with issues of forced migration.

N. DENDIAS: Yes, that’s also an interesting one.

I will add up to what you say. Something that was not part of the challenge we were facing before is the instrumentalization of migration, using migration as a weapon.

And we have seen that in two cases in recent years, one by Turkey against us and the European Union in 2020 where thousands of people were literally pushed towards the European border. And also, by the Lukashenko regime in Belarus sending people to Lithuania, again, in order to blackmail Lithuania and the European Union.

And those two are partly interconnected, I’ll give you an example. When we saw the Lithuanian crisis evolving, we were trying to figure out how migrants would arrive in Belarus. Because Belarus is not the obvious destination of migrants coming from Africa or from Asia, Central Asia etc.

And we realized that there were 35 flights per day from Turkey to Belarus. Suddenly it seems that Belarus became the favorite tourist destination from the Ataturk airport and the new airport in Istanbul.

So, we have to address the challenge of the instrumentalization of migration. At the same time, we in the European Union are very proud because we have a regime of protecting human rights and that is at the core of what the European project is.

So, if we compromise that, then we compromise the whole project and it’s a very fine balancing act not always easy to make, because we are speaking about huge numbers. Europe has now to address hundreds of thousands, million cases per year.

So, we have to find a balance between protecting our borders, protecting our societies, not allow instrumentalization of the effort of poor people to gain a better future and at the same time preserve human rights.

And if I have to say what is the top priority; is always human rights. At the end of the day that’s what it is.

——

Thank you so much Minister, it was an honor.

N. DENDIAS: Thank you. I am sure it was not an honor, I hope it was a small pleasure.

Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Hellenic Republic

Press conference by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet, Geneva, 25 August 2022

Good morning. Thank you all for joining us today – in the room and online.

As you know, after four years as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, my mandate ends next week, on 31 August.

The world has changed fundamentally over the course of my mandate.

I would say the profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ever-increasing effects of climate change, and the reverberating shocks of the food, fuel and finance crisis resulting from the war against Ukraine have been the three major issues.

Polarization within and among States has reached extraordinary levels and multilateralism is under pressure.

Important protest movements occurred in every region of the world demanding an end to structural racism, respect for economic and social rights, and against corruption, governance deficits and abuse of power – in many instances accompanied by violence, threats and attacks against protesters and human rights defenders, and at some times against journalists. Some led to real change in the country. In other cases, rather than listening to the voices of the people, governments responded by shrinking the space for debate and dissent.

Over the past few months – once the COVID situation allowed me to resume official country visits – I have been to Burkina Faso, Niger, Afghanistan, China, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Peru and Bangladesh. I have been able to see first-hand the impact of climate change, armed conflict, the food-fuel-finance crisis, hateful rhetoric, systematic discrimination, and the human rights challenges around migration, among other issues.

The UN Human Rights Office has worked, in a myriad of ways, to help monitor, engage and advocate for the protection and promotion of human rights. As I have said before, at the UN, dialogue, engagement, cooperation, monitoring, reporting and public advocacy must all be part of our DNA. We have worked to try to help bridge the gap between government and civil society, to support national implementation of human rights obligations and advise on reforms to bring laws and policies into compliance with international standards, to expand our presences in-country so we are a in a better position to work closely with the people on the ground. We have spoken out in private and public on country-specific and broader issues. And we have seen some progress.

The recognition of the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment by the UN General Assembly last month marked the culmination of many years of advocacy by civil society. I am proud of my Office’s support and strong backing of this movement throughout the course of my mandate. The extreme weather events of the past few months have again driven home, powerfully, the existential need for urgent action to protect our planet for current and future generations. Meeting this need is the greatest human rights challenge of this era – and all States have an obligation to work together on this, and to walk the talk, to fully implement the right to a healthy environment. The response to the triple planetary crisis of pollution, climate change and biodiversity loss must be centred in human rights, including the rights to participation, access to information and justice, and by addressing the disproportionate impact of environmental harms on the most marginalized and disadvantaged.

There has also been steady progress towards abolition of the death penalty – some 170 States have abolished or introduced a moratorium, in law or in practice, or suspended executions for more than 10 years. The Central African Republic, Chad, Kazakhstan, Sierra Leone and Papua New Guinea are among those who have taken steps to fully abolish the death penalty. Other States, including Liberia and Zambia are also actively considering abolition. Malaysia announced that it will abolish the country’s mandatory death penalty, including for drug related offences. As of today, 90 States have ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the key international treaty prohibiting the use of the death penalty. Concerns remain, however, about the increased use or resumption of capital punishment in other countries, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Myanmar and Singapore, and others like China and Viet Nam continue to classify data on its use as a State secret, limiting the possibility of scrutiny.

I have – from the beginning of my mandate – pushed for greater recognition of the indivisibility and interdependence of economic, social and cultural rights with civil and political rights. The effects of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine have brought into stark focus this interdependence.

States must draw lessons from the pandemic and the current food-fuel-finance crisis by designing long-term measures to build better and stronger universal public health and social protection systems. Social protection coverage must facilitate access to health care, protect people against poverty and ensure essential economic and social rights, including food, water, housing, health and education. I also call on States to adopt proactive measures, including food, agriculture and fuel subsidies, to mitigate the impact of the crises.

All of this needs to be designed with people as part of the solution, through investment in inclusive, safe and meaningful channels for debate and participation at all levels.

Governing is tough – I know because I have twice been President of my country, Chile. There are always many pressing demands, challenges and problems to address. But governing is about prioritizing – and human rights must always be a priority. In many situations my Office has been covering, there is a lack of political will to take the necessary steps to really tackle a situation head on. Political will is key – and where there is a will, there is a way.

States often invoke their own particular context when faced with allegations of human rights violations and when called upon to take steps to address them. Context is indeed important – but context must never be used to justify human rights violations.

In many instances, sustained advocacy on key human rights issues, grounded in international human rights laws and standards, bears fruit. In Colombia this month, the incoming administration has pledged a shift in its approach on drug policy – from a punitive to a more social and public health approach. By addressing one of the deep-rooted causes of violence in Colombia, this approach could be instrumental to better protect the rights of peasants, indigenous and Afro-Colombian communities and of people who use drugs, both in Colombia and globally. My Office has been advocating – globally – for a human rights-based approach on drug policy, and is ready to assist.

The worldwide mobilization of people for racial justice, notably in 2020, has forced a long-delayed reckoning with racial discrimination and shifted debates towards a focus on systemic racism and the institutions that perpetrate it. I call on all States to seize this moment to achieve a turning point for racial equality and justice. My Office is working on its second report to the UN Human Rights Council on this issue, to be presented next month.

I have always sought – even on the most challenging issues – to encourage dialogue, to open the door for further exchanges. This means listening as well as speaking, keeping our eyes and ears to the context, identifying entry points and roadblocks, and trying to build trust incrementally, even when it seems unlikely.

During my four years as High Commissioner, I had the privilege of speaking to so many courageous, spirited, extraordinary human rights defenders:

The brave, indomitable women human rights defenders in Afghanistan;

The determined mothers of the disappeared in Mexico;

The inspirational staff working at a health centre in Bunia in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, serving victims of sexual violence;

The wisdom and strength of indigenous peoples in Peru, who are on the frontlines of the impact of climate change, illegal mining and logging, and defend their rights in the face of serious risks;

And the empathy and generosity of communities hosting internally displaced people in Burkina Faso.

I found allies in traditional village leaders in Niger, who were working in their own ways to advance human rights in their communities; I met young people from Malaysia, Sweden, Australia, Costa Rica and elsewhere whose resourcefulness, creativity and ambition was palpable;

I shared the pain of the father in Venezuela who showed me the sports medals his teenage son had won, before he was killed during protests in 2017;

And I shared the tears of the mother I met in Srebrenica who carried hope that 27 years after her son disappeared, she will one day find his remains and lay him to rest next to his father’s grave.

Last week, I spoke with Rohingya refugees in Cox’s Bazar.

One teacher I met told me he had earned distinctions in all his classes at school in Myanmar and had dreamed of being a doctor. Instead, he has spent the past five years in a refugee camp, having had to flee his country – because he is Rohingya. “I still cry at night sometimes when I remember my dream,” he told me, adding that “my Buddhist friends are now doctors in Myanmar.”

My own experience as a refugee was much more comfortable, with the means to continue my education and with a good standard of living – but the yearning for one’s homeland, the desire of so many of the Rohingya to return home resonated deeply with me. Sadly, the conditions needed for them to be able to return to their homes in a voluntary, dignified and sustainable way are not there yet.

Today marks five years since more than 700,000 Rohingya women, children and men were forced to flee Myanmar for Bangladesh – and Myanmar’s human rights catastrophe continues to worsen, with the military (the Tatmadaw) maintaining military operations in Kayah and Kayin in the southeast; Chin state in the northwest; and Sagaing and Magway regions in the Bamar heartland. The use of air power and artillery against villages and residential areas has intensified. Recent spikes in violence in Rakhine State also seemed to indicate that the last fairly stable area of the country may not avoid a resurgence of armed conflict. Rohingya communities have frequently been caught between the Tatmadaw and Arakan Army fighters or have been targeted directly in operations. Over 14 million need humanitarian assistance.

We continue to document gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law on a daily basis, including repression against protesters and attacks  against civilians that may amount to crimes against humanity and war crimes.

I urge the international community to intensify pressure on the military to stop its campaign of violence against the people of Myanmar, to insist on prompt restoration of civilian rule, and accountability for violations committed by security forces.

Yesterday marked six months since Russia’s armed attack. Six unimaginably terrifying months for the people of Ukraine, 6.8 million of whom have had to flee their country. Millions others have been internally displaced. We have documented at least 5,587 civilians killed and 7,890 injured. Of these casualties, nearly 1,000 are children.

Six months on, the fighting continues, amid almost unthinkable risks posed to civilians and the environment as hostilities are conducted close to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.

I call on the Russian President to halt armed attack against Ukraine.

The Zaporizhzhia plant needs to be immediately demilitarized.

Both parties must respect, at all times and in all circumstances, international human rights law and international humanitarian law.

The international community must insist on accountability for the many serious violations documented, some of which may amount to war crimes.

I am alarmed by the resumption of hostilities in northern Ethiopia. Civilians have suffered enough – and this will only exacerbate the suffering of civilians already in desperate need. I implore the Government of Ethiopia and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front to work to de-escalate the situation and immediately cease hostilities.

I also urge a renewed focus by the international community on protracted – often forgotten – crises including the situation in Yemen, Syria, the Sahel and Haiti.

And I urge continued support for the UN Human Rights Office, the UN human rights treaty bodies, and the UN Special Procedures mechanism, all of which work tirelessly in defence of international human rights laws and standards.

The journey to defend human rights never ends – and vigilance against roll-backs of rights is vital. I honour all those who, in their own ways, are working to defend human rights. As a woman and a lifelong feminist, I want to pay particular tribute to women human rights defenders, who have been at the forefront of social movements that have benefitted all of us. They have often been the ones bringing to the table the unheard voices of the most vulnerable. I will continue to stand with you as I return home to Chile.

To end, I would like to thank you journalists, based here in Geneva and across the globe, for the indispensable work that you do. When we in the UN Human Rights Office raise the alarm, it is crucial that it rings loudly, and this is only possible when the world’s media gets the stories out there.

I thank you.

Source: United Nations Human Rights